angle-double-right calendar

Sign up today to view these articles!

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee Holds Hearings on Railroads

Jun 23, 2015, 12:57 PM by SPAN
The House Transportation Committee held its hearing on rail regulatory issues late last month.

This was the first hearing the Committee has held on these issues for at least five years, and the panel included acting Chairwoman of the Surface Transportation Board Deb Miller, American Chemistry Council President Cal Dooley, American Association of Railroads President Ed Hamberger, Short Line Association President Linda Darr, and Georgetown University Professor John Mayo, who recently published an article on railroad revenue adequacy that was financed by the Association of American Railroads.

The purpose of the House hearing was to review the economic regulatory landscape for the freight rail industry. Predictably, there was a lot of discussion of the freight rail renaissance, and the capital investments needed to maintain and grow the rail network. Both Deb Miller and Cal Dooley effectively highlighted many of the issues that this coalition supports—related to the lack of efficiency and effectiveness at the STB, and the actions underway at the agency. There was also conversation about the unreasonable cost and burden associated with the current system, and the chilling effect that puts on rail shippers to utilize the process. Ms. Miller spoke at length about the efforts underway at the STB to implement reforms, and Mr. Dooley highlighted that even in an industry where companies can sometimes afford to dispute a rate, few do because of numerous institutional and structural barriers. For smaller rail shippers, the existing process is effectively useless.