Government accounting, deficits, trillions of dollars. Why in the world are they important to scrap recyclers? Because larger and larger deficits force the government to borrow more and more.
When the government
is in the borrowing market place, it crowds out everyone else. Consequently,
the cost to industry and consumers of borrowing money increases which, of
course, increases the cost of doing business. And on and on…
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has
warned that deficits are set to explode in coming years. However, the agency's
full budget forecast suggests the problem could be much worse than first
described.
The CBO, the official scorekeeper of all budget matters,
predicts that the cumulative deficit over the next 10 years will be $1.5
trillion higher than the $7 trillion it forecast just five months ago. The
culprits? The end of 2015 passed omnibus appropriations and highway
transportation bills, and a more sluggish economic outlook. That projection,
however, may be too conservative, based on some important caveats in the CBO’s
full Budget and Economic Outlook.
Accordingly, the CBO forecast assumes that current laws
and policies will remain unchanged over the time period it analyzes. However,
the budget, taxes and spending will change, most likely in ways that
balloon the deficit.
If the Congress continues its habit of ignoring mandated
across-the-board spending cuts known as sequestration and of extending popular
tax breaks set to expire, the projected $1.5 trillion increase in the
cumulative deficit could end up doubling.
The Budget Control Act of 2011 (which put in place
automatic across-the-board cuts through 2021 (called a sequester) in order to
tame the deficit), isn't holding up as lawmakers are pushing for increased
spending, including defense. Last year's bipartisan budget deal canceled most
of those cuts and set higher discretionary spending caps for fiscal 2016 and
2017. If Congress avoids the automatic cuts each year starting in 2017, without
other budget offsets to reduce spending, the cumulative deficit would increase
by $897 billion over the decade.
The same risk applies to tax policy. In the recently passed omnibus spending
package, Congress made permanent - or otherwise extended many popular tax
breaks such as accelerated depreciation and bonus depreciation allowances
without cutting spending elsewhere to make up for the lost revenue. If that
trend continues, deficits would balloon even further. If all tax breaks scheduled
to expire by 2027 were permanently extended, revenues over the decade could
decline by as much as $426 billion.
Deficits would increase further, the report says, if
Congress decides to make permanent the suspension of some unpopular health care
taxes designed to finance President Barack Obama's signature health law.
Specifically, Congress postponed for two years a medical device tax, suspended
for one year a tax on health insurers, and postponed for two years the start of
the so-called “Cadillac tax” on high-cost insurance plans. Permanently
repealing those taxes would further reduce revenues by $256 billion between
2018 and 2026.
ENTITLEMENTS
The hike in health costs accentuated one of the greatest
challenges Congress may face in trying to tame annual deficits in coming years,
along with rising Social Security costs from an aging population and rising
interest payments on the national debt. For the first time, federal spending on
health care exceeded the cost of Social Security last year. Spending on all
major health programs surged to $936 billion last year, an increase of 13
percent from fiscal 2014. In contrast,
the government spent $882 billion on Social Security, a 4 percent increase from
the prior year.
Medicaid - The
biggest driver in health cost increases was Medicaid, which grew by $48
billion, or 16 percent last year, after a 14 percent increase in 2014. The
sharp cost spike reflected the implementation of President Obama's health care
law, under which 30 states and the District of Columbia opted to expand
Medicaid coverage.
Exchanges -
Subsidies for low-income people who bought insurance on the government-run
marketplaces known as exchanges increased by $23 billion last year, to a total
of $38 billion. Part of that increase can be explained by the fact that
subsidies weren't offered until midway through fiscal 2014, making 2015 the
first full year of implementation.
The CBO cut by more than a third
its estimate of how many people will buy health insurance this year on
government-run exchanges. In its new
budget outlook, the CBO lowered its projection from 21 million enrollees to 13
million. The new number includes 11
million who are forecast to buy subsidized coverage on the exchanges and 2
million who will buy unsubsidized coverage.
About 8 million people received subsidies for insurance last year, the
CBO said. Subsidies and related spending are projected to increase by $18
billion this year, reaching a total of $56 billion.
Medicare -
Medicare spending last year rose by $34 billion, or almost 7 percent, which the
CBO called "the fastest rate of growth recorded for the program since
2009." It attributed the increase partly to a 3 percent hike in the number
of Medicare beneficiaries and "an escalation in the number or cost of
services furnished," particularly for prescription drugs.
Social Security -
And the explosion in costs for mandatory spending — namely Social Security,
health care and interest on the debt — is only going to get worse. Social Security spending will increase from
4.9 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) this year to 5.9 percent by 2026.
Health spending will increase from 5.5 percent of GDP this year to 6.6 percent
in 2026. And interest payments on the debt will increase from 1.4 percent of
GDP this year to 3 percent in 2026, "the highest ratio since 1996,"
the report said.
PERMANENT TAX BREAKS
The CBO offered a mixed assessment about the package of
extended tax breaks. The omnibus
package, which made permanent many popular tax breaks while extending others,
is likely to boost growth in the short term but could dampen it later on. The tax extensions "increased incentives
for businesses to invest by changing the tax treatment of investment
spending." However, those tax
changes will spur faster economic growth in 2016 and 2017 "but slightly
slower growth in 2018." And, by
2016, those tax cuts could end up actually harming economic growth because a
larger cumulative deficit "would ultimately reduce private investment
enough to more than offset any positive effects on output from other aspects of
the legislation." Not a pretty picture.