A cross section of paper industry representatives assembled
in Chicago to hear positive news about their industry's health and to
learn of continuing domestic and international opportunities.
By Robert J. Garino
Robert J. Garino is director of commodities for the Institute of Scrap Recycling
Industries, Washington, D.C.
A
record number of representatives from virtually every aspect of the paper
industry--more than 225 integrated-paper-mill executives, paper and
paperboard manufacturers, paper stock processors, domestic brokers, and
waste paper exporters--participated in this year's multi-faceted Paper
Roundtable. The event, hosted by the Paper Stock Institute (PSI) of the
Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries (ISRI), was held July 19 in
Chicago.
The
unifying theme expressed by the speakers was one of continued optimism for
the paper and paper stock industries; business activity at most levels
remains healthy. PSI Chairman Richard Foohey, Great Eastern Packing and
Paper Stock Corporation, East Weymouth, Massachusetts, said the nation's
paper mills are running "flat out," with very strong mill
bookings through the remainder of this year. In fact, continued Foohey,
the paper industry has been going strong for the last two and one-half
years, an almost unheard of duration of positive news for this industry.
Adding
to the overall higher demand for paper and paperboard products has been a
documented worldwide shortfall of virgin pulp supplies. As a result,
prices for pulp are escalating--list prices, for example, have increased
for 10 consecutive quarters--and both domestic and overseas fiber
consumers are looking to increase their intake of secondary material.
Although
the export market was experiencing a so-called summer lull at the time the
roundtable convened, overseas demand for U.S. waste paper was on its way
to setting an all-time record. For the first five months of this year, 2.2
million net tons (mnt) of waste paper were exported. At this rate, more
than 5.3 mnt will leave the U.S., approximately 20 percent more than the
record tonnage set just one year ago.
Nevertheless,
roundtable speakers acknowledged certain problems within the paper stock
industry--specifically, its role in dealing with municipal solid waste.
Two speakers cited recycling as only a partial solution to the nation's
municipal solid waste disposal problem.
ISRI
President Richard E. Abrams, B. Abrams & Sons Inc., Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania, addressed additional problems members of the paper industry
face along with people involved in other areas of recycling.
"Federal, state, and local regulations on underground fuel storage
tanks affect all of us who operate truck fleets and maintain fueling
facilities on premises," Abrams pointed out. "In addition, the
way we dispose of solvents used in our maintenance operations is something
about which we must all be concerned." He said that ReMA staff is
staying abreast of all environmental regulations in efforts to help all
ISRI members comply.
The
paper and paper stock industry speakers examined the role of paper
recycling in solid waste management, offered a paper stock roundup that
focused on the domestic market, and analyzed export markets for waste
paper in Europe, Latin America, and the Pacific Rim countries of China,
South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and the Philippines.
Paper
and Municipal Solid Waste
Basil
Snider, Jr., president and CEO, Garden State Paper Company, Inc.,
Richmond, Virginia, said his company's combined annual capacity of
recycled old newspapers (ONP) totals 900,000 net tons (nt), making Garden
State one of the largest U.S. ONP recyclers. The firm is the third largest
U.S. newsprint producer.
Snider
prefaced his remarks on solid waste management with an overview of the
current U.S. paper recycling industry. He noted that, in 1987, 24.0 mnt of
waste paper and paperboard products were collected for recycling, out of
84.0 mnt of new paper grades. Based on collections, Snider put the
national recycling rate at about 29 percent. The two largest grades of
recycled paper were old corrugated containers (OCC) and ONP
Of
the 24.0 mnt collected in 1987, Snider reckoned that 19.6 mnt went back to
the paper mills for recycling into new paper products. The remainder, 4.4
mnt, was exported.
Snider
pointed out that, as impressive as the statistics may be, the U.S. cannot
simply "recycle its way out of the solid waste dilemma. ... Recycling
is not the solution. It is only a part of the solution." Snider
looked at the keys to solving the solid waste problem:
determining
which material in the solid waste stream can be recycled;
reducing
the overall solid waste stream; and
disposing
of nonrecyclable waste in carefully engineered landfills.
He
then focused on two factors that he believed will affect the solution: the
increasing end-use markets for recycled fiber; and the economics of using
secondary fiber versus using virgin raw materials.
Snider
noted that quality counts in products manufactured by paper mills using
recycled paper. As consumers become more sophisticated, he said, increased
quality standards may actually preclude the use of recycled fibers, hence
limiting outlets for waste paper. In short, manufacturers cannot recycle
garbage into acceptable paper products, observed Snider. Claims about
European or Japanese firms extracting from municipal waste fiber that
"is widely usable in new paper products are simply not true," he
said.
Snider
examined the economics of paper recycling: "One must ask whether the
costs of collecting, processing, and moving waste paper to the mill, and
then the cost of shipping finished product to the consumer, are
competitive with [costs of] paper made from trees." Paper made from
recycled materials is "not necessarily less costly to manufacture
than products made from trees," Snider stated.
Although
acknowledging an upper limit" to the use of waste paper, Snider did
not say that the U.S. had reached that level. If recycled fiber is priced
right, he observed, more manufacturers will use it. His personal guess was
that a recycling rate in the mid-30- to 40-percent range is probably the
"best we can accomplish on a national basis."
Snider
suggested that, over time, government involvement in recycling will
increase, making waste paper quality an even more critical factor.
Unfortunately, according to Snider, as public involvement grows,
sensitivity to the quality of reclaimed paper is apt to decrease. Snider
called on recyclers and manufacturers to work together to educate
rulemakers.
Recycled
Fiber Taking Off
Atlanta's
Stone Container Corporation is the "largest paper company in the
brown fiber segment," according to Howard E. Ingram, division
vice-president. The company has 12 paper and paperboard mills, all of
which use recycled fiber. Ingram stated that Stone Container is annually
using slightly more than 1 mnt of recycled fiber as part of their furnish
(raw material), most of which is OCC.
Ingram
examined the market for corrugated and noted at the outset that
"recycled fiber is the fastest growing segment of the paper
industry" because of the "explosion in the growth of demand from
the kraft linerboard mills." He said this rapid growth has occurred
because no greenfield linerboard mills have been built or announced since
1981, and because technological improvements at mills have resulted in
greater use of recycled fiber, especially OCC.
As
a consequence, kraft linerboard capacity has been stretched, resulting in
a significant increase in demand for OCC. By 1990, Ingram foresees usage
of over 2 1/2 mnt of OCC to manufacture kraft linerboard, a substantial
increase over his current consumption.
To
arrive at this projected demand figure, Ingram analyzed the domestic and
export markets for corrugated. He noted that domestic collections of OCC
have increased from between 9.4 percent and 10.3 percent in every year
since 1982 with the exception of 1985 (a recession year). Annualizing
first-quarter-1988 data, Ingram estimated corrugated collections at 12.15
mnt, more than 10 percent above 1987.
Regarding
the components which make up OCC--kraft linerboard, corrugated medium, and
recycled liner and medium--Ingram figured on a U.S. availability (after
net exports) of some 24.89 mnt. Matching this figure against total
collections of 11.18 mnt, the recovery rate last year was 44.9 percent.
While, at first glance, there appears to be an adequate supply base of OCC,
by further netting out what is lost in waste streams and waste not
collected, Ingram said the practical availability of OCC in the U.S. is
19.89 million [net] tons." He believes that new sources of corrugated
supply will be needed to meet kraft linerboard demand but, at the same
time, corrugated is well placed in using the added supply generated by
mandatory recycling programs. Echoing Snider, Ingram emphasized that paper
recycling is "only a partial solution" to the problem of solid
waste disposal in the U.S.
Europe--Contrasts
and Similarities
Joe
Merante, vice-president, export sales, Recycled Fibers Corporation,
Newark, New Jersey, said the total waste paper tonnage shipped to Europe
in 1987 was little changed compared with 1986. The two largest importing
countries, Spain and Italy, reduced their combined intake by about 12
percent; however, their declines were partially offset by large relative
increases posted by Portugal, West Germany, and Finland. Merante
identified several reasons why he believes shipments to Europe are less
than one-fourth the total tonnages exported to the Far East.
The
first, he said, was one of adequate European supply. Quite simply,
European mills have a regular supply of waste paper generated by
manufacturers strategically located in Western Europe, Scandanavia, and
the Eastern European nations.
The
second reason was one of quality control; Merante cited "greater
concern by European mills over the material purchased as a factor limiting
total U.S. exports to Europe." According to Merante, the European
market is evolving toward tighter grade specifications, which are becoming
more difficult for U.S. packers to meet. This problem is already apparent
in the Northeast," he observed.
Another
difficulty is the fact that U.S. exporters are limited by fewer shipping
points; as a consequence, exporters must compete with domestic, Canadian,
and Far East mills.
Merante
noted that the weaker U.S. dollar over the past year was a major reason
for increased shipments of the high grades of waste paper to the
Continent. The largest consumers of American high-grades continue to be in
Holland, West Germany, and Northern France.
Merante
reviewed the similarity between the European and American waste paper
industries. At the base of both industries, he noted, is the packer, who
collects, separates, and bales. The European market may be characterized
as one that is in continual movement between countries, just as the U.S.
market is one of continual interstate movement.
Another
similarity is the fact that both Europe and the U.S. export waste paper.
For example, in 1987, 97,000 metric tons (mt) of waste paper went from
Europe to Taiwan alone. The Pacific Rim is attractive to Europe mainly as
a result of competitive freight rates, ample supplies of waste paper, and
the relatively high prices for American waste paper that allow Europeans
to compete.
Merante
summed up by saying that 1987 European demand for waste paper looked sound
through the summer months and into the fall. With respect to the
high-grades, actual demand will depend on the relative strength of the
dollar. Merante believes that Spain and Portugal offer the greatest
potential for increased usage of U.S. paper stock.
Latin
America--Problems and Potential
The
Latin American paper market--debts, inflation, and politics
notwithstanding--is "thriving," according to Richard B. Garrett,
U.S. Recycling Industries, Oakland, California. He noted two trends that
characterize South and Central American waste paper imports from the U.S.:
(1) South American countries tend to concentrate on importing OCC and
double-lined kraft (DLK) grades in order to secure the necessary fiber
strength for their packaging industries; and (2) Central America and the
Caribbean islands look first at importing deinking grades and pulp
substitutes for their tissue and printing/writing mills.
Exports
of waste paper to Latin America constitute a 22 percent market share of
total U.S. exports; however, as Garrett observed, of the more than 900,000
nt of paper exported south by the U.S., Mexico absorbed nearly 800,000 nt.
Garrett discussed Mexico's difficult political atmosphere and the economic
realities facing that country.
Garrett
said Mexico has 61 paper mills with an installed capacity of some 3.7 mnt
annually. Approximately 2.8 mnt of paper were produced in Mexico last
year. Further, according to Garrett, the packaging industry accounted for
55 percent of the market, with printing/writing the next largest at 31
percent. The balance of production is in the tissue and specialty
papers-approximately 24 percent.
Currently,
Mexico's raw material imports of 518,000 nt of wood pulp and 780,000 nt of
waste paper constitute 46 percent of the furnish required. The major
grades being imported included kraft (OCC/DLK), 36 percent; ONP, 30
percent; pulp substitutes, 26 percent; deinking grades, 5 percent; and
miscellaneous grades, 3 percent.
Garrett
also discussed the export market for paper and paperboard and new
developments in Mexico's paper industry. He emphasized the close financial
links between the U.S. and Mexican economies: "A healthy U.S. economy
means a better prospect for a Mexican economic recovery."
Asia--Bright
Prospects
Procurement
Manager Don Rogers, Allan Company, Baldwin Park, California, examined the
major Pacific Rim countries importing paper stock from the U.S. Before
looking at these key countries, Rogers discussed the shortage of available
shipping containers and rising ocean freight costs. Even with certain
problems associated with overseas markets, he said, "waste paper will
still be a driving force in the ocean shipping business due to the fact
that it is a year-round commodity"
Reviewing
the export market by major grades, Rogers said he believes that "most
export grades seemed to remain strong, with the exception of old
newspaper." Although he was not sure why this particular market
remained weak, Rogers suggested that the effects of mandatory recycling, a
key industry strike, and high tipping fees (especially in the Eastern
Seaboard states) have "voided any normal summer news shortages"
that would have helped firm the market for ONP.
Rogers
said "OCC seemed to remain stable" on the world export market.
Because U.S. OCC is "the best fiber quality in the world," he
said, overseas mills will continue to buy steadily. This fact was also
noted by Garrett, who maintained that overseas markets eagerly seek OCC
for its strength. Rogers believes that there is "no substitute for
good OCC"--with the exception of DLK, which, according to Rogers, is
"not usually an economic option."
Rogers
stated that high grades of waste paper are governed by the pulp market
and, as such, the "future looks very bright for them and pulp
substitute shippers." He added that, based on the present buying of
hardwood and softwood pulp, high-grade values are "probably on the
low side."
Despite
encouraging waste paper forecasts, Rogers cautioned that, with the
changing balance of trade with Asia, fewer-goods are being shipped to the
U.S. Rogers believes this will not only affect waste paper demand from the
U.S., but will also aggravate the container availability requirements for
China, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, the
A cross section of paper industry representatives assembled in Chicago to hear positive news about their industry's health and to learn of continuing domestic and international opportunities.